My writing style seems to be getting a little harder edged these days. I’m finding myself more intent on getting a message into readers minds rather than hoping they’ll like me. This seems to be a far more effetive way of writing because I can feel a difference when I write an article or a post.

I feel more satisfied that I may have written something that will provoke a reaction in my readers. I think I picked this up from Steve Pavlina (Many thanks to him), who writes some great articles. There is no point in writing anything if it doesn’t have some sort of vibration to it. It must have an energy, so that it can resonate with the reader in a certain way. Yes it’s good to get people to think about what I say, not necessarily to agree with it. It gets boring when everything is too agreeable anyway. Dynamic is the way to go. Shaking things up a bit and provoking feedback from readers. Of course there’s no point in trying to cause a reaction for the sake of it. That’s really boring. I’ll still be writing from the heart.

This more direct form of writing will be reflected in forthcoming articles. I’m still looking for authors here at Leave The Office, so if you want to balance out my new "Tiger" approach that’ll be good. Writers who don’t mind a bit of banter with their co-authors would be interesting, liven the place up a bit and provide some entertainment here too, so come on!